Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Code Enforcement Foreclosures topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council authorizes lien standstill, new foreclosure actions to recover code‑enforcement fines
Summary
The council approved a standstill agreement with a landowner at 16169 Southern Blvd to collect a partial payment and allowed separate foreclosure actions on three other properties, citing protracted code-enforcement violations and significant outstanding liens.
The Town of Loxahatchee Groves moved on multiple code-enforcement cases July 7, approving a lien-mitigation standstill for one property and authorizing foreclosure actions on others to recover long‑running fines.
Town attorney Jeff Kurtz outlined a proposed standstill for 16169 Southern Boulevard (the PK Race Track property), where code‑enforcement liens total roughly $545,000. Under the approved modified agreement the property owner agreed to pay $136,000 as an initial, nonrefundable payment and to pursue written compliance steps; if compliance is achieved the owner may apply for a magistrate‑level lien reduction within a council‑approved timeline, and the town retained its position to oppose reductions beyond policy minima.
Kurtz told the council that the standstill will likely yield money faster than a foreclosure process and allow the town to pursue other foreclosures without drawing down contingency funds. The agreement was approved after council members pressed for tighter timelines; the council added a 60‑day compliance window tied to the deposit and clarified downstream magistrate‑hearing timing.
Council then separately approved resolutions authorizing foreclosure or prosecution for other properties with outstanding fines, describing them as long‑running, egregious violations that have gone through the special‑magistrate process and in some cases involved tenants operating without permits. Council members stressed that statutory due process had been followed and that the actions are intended to reclaim code compliance and recover costs.
Mayor and council members said the measures are necessary because some property owners had continued noncompliant uses while fines accrued and, in some cases, refused cooperation with town enforcement.
What passed: the standstill agreement (resolution 2026-55) with timeline modifications and three resolutions authorizing foreclosure or related litigation (resolutions 2026-57, 58 and 59). Several votes included a recusal where a council member had a proximity/conflict (one recusal was recorded for resolution 2026-59). Council recorded motions and votes during the meeting.
