Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Governance Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Trustees debate removing dollar and zoning limits from consent-agenda language
Summary
Trustees approved an ordinance aligning Tinley Park's consent-agenda language with state municipal code, but several trustees expressed concern that removing local language could allow items over $100,000 or zoning matters to be placed on the consent agenda; the village attorney explained trustees can still move to remove items for individual consideration.
Get email alerts on the Governance Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Trustees voted to amend the village code to align consent-agenda procedures with the Illinois municipal code, but the change drew questions from members who worried it would eliminate local safeguards.
Trustee Bill Brady introduced Ordinance 2026-O-041 to amend Title 3, Chapter 30.2 to mirror the state's omnibus voting allowances. Trustee Ken Shaw said he had only noticed the struck language shortly before the meeting and that the removed text contained two prohibitions: items that would result in expenditures in excess of $100,000 and zoning matters. "My reading of it, late reading, I would admit, is that I don't believe the state law covers that," Shaw said, adding that he personally favored retaining a numeric threshold.
Village Attorney Tiffany responded that the state law is permissive: a board may take matters on an omnibus basis and any board member can move to remove an item from the consent agenda for separate consideration. "So the board could still vote on those types of items separately," Tiffany said, "but this is more of an effort to streamline your board meetings and also to make the allowance under the municipal code to take things on an omnibus basis."
Several trustees said they understood the process but noted the tradeoff between streamlined meetings and local control. Trustee Ken Shaw said he would be "okay with supporting the ordinance as proposed" if the board could revisit a default number later, such as passing a directive or a resolution to instruct the village manager how to handle high-dollar items on the consent agenda.
The board voted on the ordinance after the discussion and the motion carried. Trustees and staff indicated they could revisit the matter at a future meeting or issue a directive if the board wanted to reinstate a local dollar threshold or special handling for zoning matters.

