Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Signs Banners topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Duval council workshops banner‑sign rules; staff to tighten size, sponsor and display language
Summary
Council and staff discussed a draft, content‑neutral banner policy tied to a sign‑code update, focusing on correcting a 30‑foot banner drafting error, limiting sponsor logo prominence, and clarifying display windows as 'up to 14 days depending on availability.' Staff will revise language before adoption.
The Duval City Council on July 7 reviewed a draft banner policy that will be folded into a forthcoming sign‑code update, with staff agreeing to tighten several drafting issues and provide clearer guidance on permit review and display windows.
Staff and council members said the policy — written to be content‑neutral — was intended as a short, practical set of permit rules rather than a philosophical code change. Council members called attention to what one called an apparent drafting error that would allow a 30‑foot wide banner on corner light poles; staff acknowledged the problem and said they would correct the dimensional matrix before the code returns for adoption.
Councilors also questioned how the draft treats sponsor recognition. One member asked whether business logos should be limited to a fixed percentage of banner area to avoid visually dominant corporate branding; staff said the permit review practice is intended to guard against distracting or unreadable designs, and cautioned that overly strict limits could prevent events with many small sponsors from including all contributors. A councilor asked staff to add language making sponsor recognition “incidental to the primary community message,” which staff said they would incorporate.
On display timing, the draft currently allows banners on public infrastructure for up to 14 days within a three‑week window prior to an event. Staff told council that high demand and limited installation crews often require rotating banners and that the city sometimes cannot guarantee the full 14‑day run for every applicant. Councilors and staff agreed to reword the policy to clarify availability — for example, ‘up to 14 days depending on staffing and scheduling’ — to avoid creating entitlement expectations.
Randy Banneker, speaking for the Seattle‑King County Realtors during public comment, thanked the city for the collaborative workshop approach, urged care with content‑neutral legal constraints, and offered to submit model code language in writing. Staff emphasized the banner policy is part of a larger sign‑code package and that the city will accept additional feedback before the proposed code returns for formal adoption.
The draft banner policy is currently part of an agenda bill provided for council review; staff said it is not scheduled for final action at the July 7 meeting but will be included in the packet when the formal sign‑code is set for adoption.
