Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Fund Balance Policy topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee weighs higher reserve target, cites disaster risk; accountant flags $9.7M unlevied tax revenue

Income Strategies Committee · March 9, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Committee member Jessica Farno proposed adopting a 30–40% general fund balance target because of Louisiana's disaster risk; the city's senior accountant reported more than $9.7 million in voter-approved property tax revenue remains unlevied and governmental fund balances exceed $60 million.

At the March 9 Income Strategies Committee meeting, Jessica Farno, committee member, urged the committee to consider a higher general fund balance target because of the frequency of natural disasters in Louisiana. Farno said the Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA) guidance suggests a minimum of roughly two months of operating expenses (about 16–17%), but she proposed a 30–40% target range and presented a sample resolution to establish a formal general fund balance policy.

During public comment, Kathleen Sides, senior accountant, provided financial figures aimed at informing that discussion. Sides said the city has more than $9.7 million in voter-approved property tax revenue that remains unlevied and uncollected, that governmental fund balances exceed $60 million, and that roughly $30 million could be rededicated from restricted funds. Sides also noted recent changes to the pay scale, including a reduction from 30 steps to 25 and a reduction in the percent between steps from 2.5% to 2%.

Committee members discussed report formats and graphs in a brief exchange but took no formal vote on a fund-balance policy at the meeting. The sample resolution presented by Farno was entered for committee consideration and staff follow-up; no adoption or implementation timeline was specified at the meeting.