Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Local Government Enforcement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Fort Pierce special magistrate finds violations across multiple properties, issues compliance windows
Summary
At a July 9 special magistrate hearing, Magistrate Jamie Barrow found violations in numerous Fort Pierce properties for unpermitted construction and unsafe conditions, ordering most respondents to obtain permits within 60–180 days or face fines of $250 per day.
Jamie Barrow, special magistrate for the City of Fort Pierce, on July 9 found building-code or minimum-housing violations in a string of cases and set deadlines for property owners to obtain permits and complete required repairs.
The city presented evidence, including inspector photographs and permit histories, in each case. In cases where work had been done without permits — commonly sheds, enclosed carports, mini-split air-conditioning units, electrical service and permanent RV connections — the magistrate generally ordered respondents to pull permits and obtain required inspections or face civil fines of $250 per day.
Notable outcomes included a 90-day compliance window for Terry Taylor at 744 Carlisle Way to obtain permits for a shed and a removable covering on a garage opening; a 180-day window for the estate of Frankie Lou Noble (1511 Avenue E) after the magistrate took into account testimony that a December collision had shifted the house and that the family faces financial hardship; and 60–90 day deadlines in routine administrative matters for commercial and residential owners who had not obtained permits, including properties at 3362 Selvitz Road, 2306 Orange Avenue and multiple rental units on Boston Avenue and Binney Drive. In the case of 1703 Miami Court, the magistrate ordered 60 days for corrective work after the owner said trash had been removed and staff recommended he work with named building-department contacts to clear items not requiring a permit.
City inspectors repeatedly told the court that permit applications for some properties had been submitted and in several cases were rejected at administrative intake; magistrate Barrow encouraged owners to work with building-department staff and, where appropriate, with the grants office to explore demolition or repair grants.
‘‘The focus here is on safety — get the permits, get the inspections, and if you need help the building department or grants staff can assist,’’ Barrow said as she issued orders and reminded respondents they have 30 days to file an appeal where allowed.
Most respondents acknowledged the violations and described financial or logistical barriers to immediate compliance; several asked for additional time and assistance. The magistrate granted extended timelines in cases where it was justified by hardship or ongoing permit-review activity. The hearing concluded after staff explained notice procedures for absent respondents and the court adjourned.
What happens next: respondents have the period stated in their orders to obtain permits and inspections; the city may begin daily fines of $250 for noncompliance after the period ends. Those who wish to challenge an order have 30 days to appeal.
