Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Pcd Site Design topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Commissioners transmit PCD with 35-foot height limit, require monument sign and masonry columns

Clay County Planning Board · July 8, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Clay County planning board transmitted a Planned Commercial Development after residents pressed for a masonry buffer and the board added conditions including a 35-foot maximum building height and removal of the existing sign for replacement by a monument sign.

The Clay County Planning Board voted to transmit a planned-commercial-development (PCD) application after adding two conditions requested by board members: a maximum building height of 35 feet and removal of the existing on-site sign to be replaced by a monument sign. The transmittal advances the application to the County Commission for final action.

Resident speakers urged stronger, permanent buffers along the project edge. One resident, who identified herself as Joan Bazely, said a brick or decorative block wall should be built "before the first shovel of dirt is turned," arguing that vegetation dies and does not provide a lasting buffer. The applicant confirmed the fence will include masonry columns with vinyl panels and landscape on both sides.

During the hearing the applicant's presenter said the written commitments already specify the fence, gates and that columns and fence elements will be constructed in phase 1 of work. A commissioner moved to transmit the staff report with the two changes — the 35-foot height cap and replacement of the existing sign with a monument sign — and another commissioner seconded the motion. The board voted to transmit the item; staff recorded one dissenting vote on the motion.

The board also discussed sign design and fence material. A commissioner suggested colored vinyl rather than white to avoid long-term mold and staining; another asked staff to confirm setbacks and minimum lot requirements were met. The applicant said required setbacks were adjusted to be more restrictive on the PCD and that all commitments discussed would be included in the ordinance and project documents.

The transmittal does not itself authorize construction; it forwards the PCD to the County Commission and the development documents will return for adoption and implementation details, including any building permits and inspections.