Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Community Issues topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Residents press council on long‑running Wiss Fields drainage and an appealed vehicle tax bill
Summary
During public comment Alice Kelly urged the council to stop deferring action on persistent swampy conditions at Wiss Fields and called attention to cost gaps between repair options; another resident, Gerda Semval, described a disputed vehicle tax bill she says resulted from missed mail and an expired appeals window.
Get email alerts on the Community Issues topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Cromwell — Two residents used the council’s public comment period on July 8 to press elected officials about long‑standing local problems: persistent drainage at Wiss Fields and a contested vehicle tax bill.
Alice Kelly (47 Willowbrook Road) asked for clarity about remediation options for Wiss Fields, which she said have been an issue since the school opened in 2005. She questioned consultant cost estimates and whether partial fixes would merely delay a larger expense. “I’m hoping that in this day and age, that we will not have to be talking about the swampy fields at a school that has been in existence for 20 years,” Kelly said, noting the least‑expensive option was estimated at about $1.5 million and more comprehensive work could reach $4 million.
Gerda Semval of Rocky Hill described a separate concern over vehicle tax billing tied to a truck her husband parks in Cromwell while working long‑distance. Semval said the vehicle was registered in Indiana, parked in Cromwell for less than 90 days per year, and that she provided documentation to the assessor’s office. She said staff told her the appeals window had closed and that, after speaking with the town manager and assessor’s office, there was no administrative remedy available through the council. “I do believe in making your voice heard,” Semval said as she asked whether additional avenues remained.
Council members and staff explained that assessment appeals and adjustments fall under the assessor and the Board of Assessment Appeals and that statutory time limits and state law constrain the council’s ability to intervene directly. The town manager urged residents to pursue the formal appeal process and to share documentation with the assessor’s office.
The council did not take action on either item at the meeting but noted staff would pursue programmatic options and directed the mayor and town manager to follow up with residents where appropriate.

