Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Wetlands Delineation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission approves 86 K Street plan with conditions after debate over wetland delineation
Summary
The commission approved a permit for a single‑family home at 86 K Street after accepting a field 'general limits' wetland boundary; approval includes three pre‑construction conditions — submit a surveyed wetland delineation and record both the approved delineation and the as‑built with the deed — and a requirement that a full delineation be completed before future activities.
The Granby Inland Wetlands & Watercourses Commission approved an application for a single‑family home at 86 K Street on July 8, voting to accept a field‑determined "general limits" wetland boundary and to impose recording and verification conditions.
Jonathan Vosberg, the applicant, told the commission he revised the plan after a site review and moved the wetland boundary closer to the GIS line used in earlier subdivision mapping. Wetland agent Kate said she and a soil scientist had inspected the site; she described a compromise boundary based on observable hydric soils but said the soil scientist declined to perform a full, detailed delineation at this time.
Commissioners debated whether to require a formal third‑party delineation now or accept Kate's field boundary as a general limit. Several members said they had routinely required formal delineations in the past to avoid future disputes; others said the site’s fill and long standing soil disturbance make a full delineation difficult and that the proposed boundary would not materially change the current plan.
The commission approved the application with three conditions recommended by staff: prior to start of work, submit an approved wetland delineation on the existing‑conditions plan to be recorded with the deed; upon completion of work, file an as‑built plan showing wetland boundaries to be attached to the deed; and a note in the approval letter stating the current boundary is a general delineation and any new activities would require a detailed delineation. The motion carried; the record will reflect the conditions and recordation requirement.
The commission also noted that if future owners propose new activities, a more detailed delineation will be required and recorded as part of any subsequent approval. The applicant may request staff follow‑up and a site visit; the commission left procedural details for staff to finalize.
