Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Infrastructure topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council weighs Walnut Street infrastructure plan, TIF funding and EPA lead-line loan
Summary
Oglesby council discussed using TIF funds and an EPA/IEPA loan to replace lead service lines, electrical infrastructure and sidewalks on Walnut Street; commissioners recommended estimates and a working meeting to prioritize projects and assess funding and grant options.
Councilors spent an extended portion of the meeting discussing a proposed Walnut Street infrastructure program that could include lead service line replacements, electrical conduit work under sidewalks and ADA-compliant sidewalk replacement. The topic was framed as part of the city’s TIF (tax increment financing) district covering Walnut Street.
Speaker 1 (Commissioner McDermott) and other commissioners described a range of needs along Walnut Street, noting that lead-line replacement and associated electrical work would be minimum priorities if the council proceeds. Commissioner McDermott said the council needs clearer scope and cost estimates before committing funds: “If I don't know the specifics, what people want, I can't really give you an estimate,” he said.
Staff reported that the TIF fund had an approximate balance of $865,000 and an available increment that could push available dollars to just over $1,000,000, but cautioned that the fund must cover intergovernmental agreements and other obligations. Councilors discussed that some larger projects (for example proposed bridge resurfacing) could quickly exhaust the TIF balance. The council agreed to pursue current-minimum priorities—water/lead service lines, electrical under sidewalks and ADA sidewalk replacement—and to convene a working meeting to obtain estimates and to prioritize phased work.
Councilors also discussed the EPA/IEPA loan program for lead service replacement and whether participation would affect existing loan-forgiveness programs; staff indicated the two programs would not conflict if structured properly. Commissioners asked staff to provide bids/estimates (three bids were suggested) and a multi-year plan so the council can decide allocation and sequencing.
Next steps: staff and the designated commissioners will prepare cost estimates, seek possible grant matches, and convene a working meeting to present a prioritized, multi-year plan for council review.
