Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Infrastructure Maintenance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Denison debates renting vs. buying pavement equipment after mastic tests
Summary
Public works staff described recent tests of a mastic patching machine and discussed renting versus purchasing a multipurpose mastic/crack-sealing machine. Council asked for cost calculations and a more comprehensive daily work log before considering a capital purchase.
Get email alerts on the Infrastructure Maintenance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Public Works Director Rod told the Denison City Council the department has been testing mastic patching (using a rented Durapatcher) and evaluating whether to rent again or trade in the current equipment for a mastic machine that could also be fitted for crack sealing.
Rod said the city and county previously split a rental cost (about $4,000 for a two-week rental), and described manpower requirements—usually four or five people—to operate the unit. He estimated a new mastic-capable machine could be in the $80,000 range, plus roughly $3,000–$5,000 to add an attachment to allow crack sealing. Rod said the mastic held up in testing but recommended further observation through a hot-weather season before committing to purchase.
Council members pressed for better documentation of day-to-day work in the department’s Dropbox reports and asked staff to return with a calculation comparing continuing to rent, renting again for a longer trial, or purchasing and retrofitting a machine (including potential trade-in of the Durapatcher). One councilmember suggested the county might share rental costs again.
No purchase was approved. Council directed staff to prepare cost comparisons, material inventories, and a plan for reporting daily work so the council can judge the return on any equipment purchase.
