Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Conservation Easement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Authority approves conservation easement for parcel north of Charlottesville, requires narrower building envelope
Summary
The ACA approved a conservation easement for a privately donated parcel near Barracks Road after voting to approve the easement subject to staff and the landowner reducing mapped critical-slope areas inside the building envelope and documenting field verification.
The ACA voted to approve a conservation easement for a parcel just north of Charlottesville near Barracks Road, but the authority attached a condition that staff and the landowner refine the building envelope to remove areas mapped as critical slope.
Staff presented the proposal and noted the property sits partly in the development area and partly in protected green systems. "The proposal meets the acceptance criteria, so staff recommends approval," the staff member said, explaining the easement would allow the two existing dwellings (the main house and a garage apartment) or their replacements only within a defined building envelope, impose a 400-foot setback preventing structures over 50 square feet, and prohibit clearing for agriculture while allowing limited commercial forestry.
The presentation highlighted roughly 20 acres in a mountain protection area and noted substantial wooded critical slopes. Staff said the Planning Commission had reviewed the parcel and "ruled that an easement would be consistent with the comprehensive plan." During discussion, a committee member raised the concern that leaving small interior, unbuildable "donut" holes inside a building envelope could invite scrutiny from the IRS of donor intent. "If it's in fact critical slopes, I was just hoping we could cut across there," the committee member said, urging elimination of mapped steep pockets in the envelope.
The landowner's representative said some areas flagged as critical slope on the map do not appear as steep on the ground and offered to document any discrepancies. Participants agreed to field-verify the northerly corner the committee had identified; the authority's motion approved the easement "pending working on that upper corner to reduce the amount of critical slopes that is included within the building area." Staff said it would document field findings in the baseline report so the authority would not likely have to revisit the item.
The motion to approve, as amended, carried by voice vote when members answered "Aye." The meeting record shows the authority also followed standard procedure to certify a prior closed meeting and to consult legal counsel on interpretation of easement language. The authority asked staff to return to a future meeting with documented field verification and the recommended map adjustments, and staff offered to present the refined envelope to members and the landowner before final recording.
What's next: staff will perform a field verification of the northerly building-envelope area cited by members, document findings in the baseline report, and produce a revised envelope for review; the easement approval will be finalized after those steps.
