Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Legal topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council moves to closed attorney–client session over Ajax matter
Summary
A proposed amendment touching the Ajax facility prompted a point of order about potential litigation; the council voted to enter an attorney–client privileged closed session to discuss the issue.
Late in the meeting an amendment related to the Ajax facility prompted a point of order about litigation status. Council members and the city attorney discussed whether litigation had been served and whether the amendment language was appropriate to consider in open session. The council voted without objection to go into attorney–client privileged closed session to receive legal advice on the matter; the public meeting was temporarily closed while the council met in private.
No further public details about the Ajax litigation were released at the time the council recessed into closed session.
