Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Taxes topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Borough weighs adding EMS millage to fund ambulance services; officials pledge transparency

Finance Committee · July 9, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Council discussed a proposed EMS millage of about 0.45 mills expected to raise roughly $350,000 annually; staff said the increase would add about $13 to the typical tax bill and that proceeds must be used for ambulance, rescue and EMS services per PA borough code; council directed further review at a work session.

Council members spent a portion of the meeting discussing whether the borough should add a dedicated EMS millage to fund ambulance and emergency medical services.

Barb presented the requested calculation, saying a 0.45-mill increase would translate to roughly a 0.87% tax increase for an average assessed property. She said the EMS portion of the typical bill would be about $81.97 and that the taxpayer’s total bill would rise by about $13 annually under the proposed change. Barb emphasized that Pennsylvania borough code allows levying up to one-half mill for ambulance and rescue services but, as a home-rule borough, the council could exceed that limit if it chose; she also stressed that the levy is intended specifically for ambulance, rescue and EMS operations and not for police or fire services.

A public commenter, Ian, asked whether the EMS revenue would be held in a separate, dedicated fund and requested full transparency showing how much of the general fund previously supported EMS so residents could see the net fiscal effect. The chair and staff said tax-bill labeling and budget presentations are intended to provide that transparency and that staff (Sean) will present details in follow-up budget materials.

Council members said they were generally supportive of the presentation but noted there was not yet full consensus to enact a separate EMS tax and directed the matter to the work session for further discussion and analysis.

Ending: The council did not enact the millage at the meeting and agreed to continue consideration at a forthcoming work session; staff will prepare additional financial detail and transparency materials for review.