Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Election Administration topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Martin's Additions election committee adopts SOP to address postal ballot delays, sets 'significant' threshold at five ballots
Summary
After months of mail delays, the Martin's Additions election committee approved a standard operating procedure to track and handle missing or replacement mailed ballots, agreeing that as few as five undelivered ballots could trigger remedial action for this small village.
The Martin's Additions election committee voted unanimously to adopt a standard operating procedure to address postal delays and the handling of missing mailed ballots, the committee chair said.
The new SOP, approved with wording changes, lays out steps for tracking return envelopes, notifying the vendor, and issuing replacement ballots. Committee chair Marty said the measure is aimed at ensuring election integrity after the village saw delayed and misrouted ballot mailings this year.
Why it matters: In a small electorate, a handful of missing ballots can determine contest outcomes. Marty told the committee that "a significant number is 5 because we've had elections often decided by 2 or 3 votes," saying that five undelivered ballots could exceed typical margins in Martin's Additions and therefore justify remedial steps.
What the SOP does: The procedure requires the committee to (1) attempt to sort vendor tracking data by date to isolate current‑year mailings, (2) request vendor confirmation or scans of mailed packets when needed, (3) log replacement requests at the in‑person dropbox event, and (4) use a tiered logistics approach for replacements. Under the plan members agreed that if replacement ballots exceed about 10 voters the vendor will FedEx a single box to the election committee for local distribution; for smaller numbers the vendor may overnight ballots to individual voters.
Vendor capability and cost: Committee members pressed the contractor's ability to add tracking to outgoing ballots. Chair said the vendor told the committee that printing per‑address tracking on outgoing envelopes would be labor intensive and costly — an estimate the committee recalled as several thousand dollars in prior negotiations. Some members questioned whether the work was technically impossible or primarily a cost issue, but the committee prioritized a cost‑benefit approach and contingency procedures.
Recordkeeping and oversight: The SOP formalizes a dual‑record system at the dropbox event (a voter roll with a replacement request mark plus a notebook noting the requester and address) and assigns two committee members to monitor postal tracking data and voter service inquiries. Chair asked committee members Jack and Mike Z. to check tracking reports before the dropbox event.
What remains: The committee will include the SOP as an attachment to its May 14 council report and monitor whether the vendor can provide additional tracking information at reasonable cost. The chair said the SOP is not final law but a committee management tool to reduce risk and to document procedures in case remedial steps are needed.
