Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the School Concurrency topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
School district supports smaller concurrency areas to hit 100% service levels
Summary
A school‑district representative told the planning body the district expects to achieve 100% level‑of‑service targets and supports increasing concurrency service areas from two to five to allow more localized capacity accounting; staff said updated maps and interlocal approvals will be needed before changes are adopted.
School officials and county staff on July 9 discussed restructuring school concurrency rules in the PASCO 2050 update so the county measures capacity in smaller, more local service areas.
A school‑district representative told the commission that when concurrency was adopted in 2008 the county used higher percentage thresholds for elementary and middle schools (115%) and a lower threshold for high schools (105%) to reflect program and class‑size needs. "With all of the schools we've built the last 20 years or so and growth slowing down, we believe we can achieve 100% in all of these," the representative said, explaining why staff proposes adjusting the percentage targets.
Staff proposed increasing the number of concurrency service areas from two to five to create smaller geographic units for capacity calculations; that change would let a developer count available capacity within a smaller area rather than across the entire county. The representative said revised maps are not ready for the planning commission to review because the interlocal agreement with the school board is still being updated; final adoption will require Board of County Commissioners and school‑board approval.
On mitigation if concurrency fails, staff described a mechanism in which developers could pay the equivalent impact fees upfront (at certificate of occupancy timelines and legal limits apply) to address short‑term overages and proceed with projects. Staff committed to include updated maps in the Invest chapter when it returns for final adoption and to highlight the interlocal and Board approvals required to change the service‑area framework.
The commission requested staff present the new service‑area maps and the updated interlocal language before the Invest chapter goes to the Board for adoption. No formal adoption occurred at the workshop.
