Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Council Votes topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council approves four resolutions; sets public hearing for Parkside Partners development
Summary
West Branch City Council voted 4–1 to set a public hearing on a Parkside Partners development agreement and unanimously approved pay estimate #3 for Cedar Johnson Road, an agreement with TAP Services (LOST-funded), and a depository limit change (minutes show a numbering inconsistency).
Get email alerts on the Council Votes topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The West Branch City Council on Aug. 18 approved four resolutions and set a public hearing on a proposed development agreement with Parkside Partners, LLC.
The council voted 4–1 to adopt Resolution 2025-84 to set a public hearing on an agreement that would provide annual tax-increment rebates to Parkside Partners; Councilmember Jodee Stoolman recorded the lone no vote. Councilmember Tom Dean made the motion and Colton Miller seconded.
Councilmembers also approved payment of Pay Estimate #3 for the Cedar Johnson Road project (Resolution 2025-88) by a 5–0 vote. The council approved an agreement with TAP Services (Resolution 2025-89) and recorded that the work would be paid from LOST funds; that action also passed 5–0.
On a related financial item the minutes list approval of a depository limit change (item shown as Resolution 2025-90). The motion recorded in the minutes refers to 'Resolution 2025-86' while the item header lists 2025-90; the council vote on the item was recorded as 5–0. The minutes contain that internal numbering inconsistency but show the council approved the depository limit change.
No amendments to the resolutions were reported. The council voted by roll call on each motion as recorded in the minutes.
The public hearing for the Parkside Partners development agreement was set; no hearing date is listed in the minutes. The council directed staff to proceed with the public-notice and hearing steps necessary to bring the proposed agreement back for formal consideration.
