Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Use Variance Pompton 257 topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board approves use variance to recognize three apartments at 257 Pompton Avenue
Summary
The Verona Zoning Board granted a D(1) use variance for 257 Pompton Avenue on July 9, allowing the property's three existing residential units to be recognized as conforming use; the applicant said no exterior changes are planned and neighbors raised concerns about precedent and character.
The Verona Zoning Board of Adjustment on July 9 voted to approve a use variance for 257 Pompton Avenue, allowing the property to be recognized as a three‑unit multifamily residence.
The applicant testified that the building has functioned as residential for years and that his requested change involves only interior work — adding a stove and reconfiguring doors to convert an upstairs unit into a full apartment. He told the board there will be no exterior alterations, no new HVAC units, and no increase in impervious coverage.
Board members and the township's zoning officer reviewed engineering comments and historical approvals. The applicant said he had not observed flooding on the site and acknowledged the property contains existing sump pits. He said he plans to assign parking spaces to tenants and described an existing detached garage and driveways as sufficient for the required parking.
Neighbors questioned the applicant about outreach and precedent. Anna Lucero of Verona told the board she had not been contacted and said she is concerned the approval would change the character of the neighborhood. Another neighbor, Anthony Gardner, said peak traffic on Compton Avenue and a nearby intersection raise safety concerns. The applicant said he had met with some residents, given a property tour, and answered questions in an effort to address concerns.
During deliberation, several board members said the revised interior plan and the property's location adjacent to Route 23 made the three‑unit outcome reasonable. Board members also noted that the granting of a use variance becomes part of the property record and that any future change would require the appropriate approvals.
A motion to approve the application was made and seconded; the chair announced the motion had passed with the number of affirmative votes required under the board's rules.
The applicant thanked the board and the public for their time and said he will proceed with the necessary permits to complete the interior work. The board indicated the approving resolution will be drafted by counsel and considered at the next regular meeting; no final building permits become effective until the memorializing resolution is adopted.
