Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Solar Ordinance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning Board reviews draft solar ordinance, decides to separate wind and solar rules
Summary
The Board compared competing drafts, agreed to keep wind energy language in a separate ordinance, discussed simplifying technical terms, rooftop and ground-mounted height limits, wetlands setbacks, and battery-storage/fire-code references, and targeted an October public hearing with the goal of placing the ordinance on next year’s ballot.
Get email alerts on the Solar Ordinance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Planning Board reviewed two draft versions of a proposed Solar Energy ordinance and agreed to treat wind and solar as separate articles rather than combining them.
Members compared a draft circulated by David Shirley with a version from Brett Dunn (the latter marked with highlighted changes). The Board discussed simplifying technical terms such as 'photovoltaic energy systems' to clearer language like 'solar energy systems' for public readability. They debated height restrictions for rooftop panels across zoning districts and screening requirements in the Historic District; one draft specifically addressed lake-district height limits and screening.
Ground-mounted systems and siting near wetlands, rivers, lakes and ponds drew attention; Ms. Sullivan noted construction activities and setbacks are covered in the existing ordinance language and can be cross-referenced to NH Department of Environmental Services rules. The Board also discussed electricity storage, whether battery locations and restrictions belong in the zoning ordinance or should be handled through Fire Code references, and industry sizing conventions (for example, visualization of a 100-kilowatt system).
Chair Steve Carten said the discussion was productive but that more work was needed with Mr. Shirley present to clarify certain references. The Board agreed to continue redrafting and to aim for a first public hearing in October, with the goal of getting the ordinance on next year’s ballot; the Chair emphasized not rushing the document so it would not require early amendment.
