Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Licensure And Discipline topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board approves disciplinary stipulation, grants trade name and acts on several reciprocity applications
Summary
The board approved a proposed stipulation and final agency order in case 202703 (including an $800 administrative fine and conditional trade-name approval), approved the trade-name 'Juniman Eye Care' for Dr. Troy Juniman, and made several licensure or tabled decisions on reciprocity applications pending contracts or references.
Get email alerts on the Licensure And Discipline topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Kansas State Board of Optometry approved a proposed stipulation and final agency order in disciplinary case 202703, granted a trade-name application for Juniman Eye Care, and handled numerous reciprocity and licensure items.
Legal counsel Tim Raesstrom summarized the stipulation in case 202703: the matter stemmed from a corporate reorganization and an unapproved trade name at one practice location. As negotiated, the respondent agreed to an administrative fine and to obtain trade-name approval; Raesstrom described the agreed fine as approximately $800 consistent with the board’s historical approach. The board moved to accept the proposed stipulation and final agency order and approved it by voice vote.
Separately, the board considered a trade-name application for Juniman Eye Care. Dr. Troy Juniman joined remotely and said he was aware of another nearby practice with a similar family name (Phillipsburg) but did not expect public confusion because of geographic separation and the different markets. "I don't believe it would cause any confusion," Juniman said. The board moved and approved the trade-name application.
On reciprocity and licensure, the board reviewed numerous applicants. Several reciprocity applications were tabled pending receipt of contracts or lists of contracted nursing-home facilities (for applicants working through a company). For example, the board tabled Dr. Pham’s reciprocity application until the required contract was submitted; the board indicated it would consider a short Zoom review once complete. Other applicants, including Dr. Lillian McIntyre and Dr. Jeffrey Strand, were approved for licensure by reciprocity after motions and votes.
The board also discussed administrative processes for handling incomplete applications, agreeing to use targeted follow-up (including possibly short, ad hoc meetings) to avoid delaying a candidate’s process for months. Several specific motions approving licenses were recorded and the executive officer was directed to follow up with applicants on missing paperwork.
The board’s recorded actions included motions to table incomplete applications and motions to accept stipulations and approvals where documentation was complete.

