Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Survivors 1st topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Survivors 1st diversion partnership cited as alternative to prosecution for survivor defendants

Washington Supreme Court · June 10, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Speakers described Survivors 1st, a King County referral and diversion model that screens people arrested after experiencing gender‑based violence and can refer eligible cases to the YWCA for comprehensive services instead of prosecution; presenters said the YWCA worked about 239 referrals in 2024 and served more than 140 women in the cited year.

A panel at the Washington Supreme Court symposium highlighted Survivors 1st, a King County program that aims to prevent people who have experienced gender‑based violence from being criminalized for acts connected to that victimization.

How it works: Presenters said the program operates through referral and screening: prosecutors, courts or defense may identify possible survivor‑defendants; eligible cases can be diverted or charges declined and the person is referred to the YWCA, which performs a warm handoff and provides legal advocacy, housing help and trauma‑informed services. As Dr. Carolyn West explained, the King County Prosecuting Attorney’s Office steps back in appropriate cases and community partners provide follow‑up supports.

Participation and outcomes: Panelists reported the program handled a broad range of cases in 2024 — from domestic‑violence self‑defense incidents to thefts committed by people without resources; they said about 239 cases were referred in 2024 and the YWCA reported serving over 142 women in the year referenced. Survivors who spoke described immediate benefits including safety planning, advocacy and continuity of care in place of automatic prosecution.

Limitations and evidence: Presenters said the program is expanding but that rigorous outcome data are still being collected; one presenter acknowledged that while some jurisdictions are piloting similar approaches, more evaluation is needed to document effects on recidivism, survivor safety and costs. A justice in the room asked whether the TRC (trauma recovery center) concept was already being planned for Washington; presenters described TRCs as a vision and advocacy priority rather than a state‑funded, fully planned program at the time of the symposium.

Next steps: Panelists urged prosecutors and law‑enforcement partners to check for survivor status before charging and to develop similar referral pathways. No formal court action followed the presentations.