Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Land Use topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Planning board endorses Resendiz Residential LLC ANR plan for 200 Highcrest Road

Fall River Planning Board · July 9, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Fall River Planning Board unanimously endorsed an ANR plan (file no. 26‑1682) for 200 Highcrest Road filed by Resendiz Residential LLC; board members said the plan meets U‑19 zoning frontage and lot size requirements and noted a prior subdivision request had been denied.

The Fall River Planning Board voted July 8 to endorse an ANR plan filed by Resendiz Residential LLC for property at 200 Highcrest Road (file no. 26‑1682).

Chair John Ferrera introduced the filing and stated the applicant is Resendiz Residential LLC with Steven Rezendes listed as manager. A committee member explained the current filing is an approval‑not‑required (ANR) plan that meets the U‑19 zoning district standards for frontage and lot size after a prior subdivision petition seeking to create three single‑family lots had been denied following neighborhood opposition. The member recommended endorsement.

A committee member moved to approve the ANR plan; Chair John Ferrera seconded. The board voted in favor, recorded 5–0. The endorsement means the plan as presented met the technical criteria for endorsement; no zoning relief was granted in this action. The transcript notes the applicant’s prior subdivision attempt had been denied and that the ANR meets the stated frontage (about 100 feet) and minimum lot size (about 12,000 square feet) requirements for the U‑19 district as described to the board.

The endorsement allows the applicant to proceed with whatever next steps are allowed under local land‑use procedures for endorsed ANR plans. The board recorded the vote as unanimous (5–0); roll call names were read during the meeting but the audio transcript does not permit an unambiguous mapping of voice IDs to individual member names, so this account reports the certified tally rather than attributing each yes vote to a specific recorded voice.