Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Historic Preservation Signage topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Historic Preservation panel approves All I See is Gold sign at 18 W. Maple Ave

Merchantville Historic Preservation Commission · February 26, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Merchantville Historic Preservation Commission voted unanimously Feb. 26 to approve exterior signage and related exterior work for All I See is Gold at 18 W. Maple Ave after hearing testimony from a Signarama representative and discussing brick preservation and lighting.

The Merchantville Historic Preservation Commission voted unanimously on Feb. 26 to approve a sign and exterior improvements application for All I See is Gold at 18 W. Maple Ave.

Ethan Paulto, a representative for Signarama, testified that the proposed signage would be black acrylic letters mounted flush to the building using silicone adhesive and 6-inch bolts, with letters finished in brushed gold. Paulto said the storefront would also include a round acrylic sign on the front brick and an additional sign facing the parking lot; he said the plan does not include painting the brick. On lighting, Paulto said he expects soffit-mounted signs to be lit and that he will recommend goose-neck fixtures for the overhang: "I anticipate soffit signs to be lit and will suggest the goose neck lighting."

Member Narcum raised concerns that removing fasteners could damage the building's brick and suggested enlarging the brick-mounted sign and aligning bolts with areas that would be easier to repair. Member Waldron proposed the lighting approach and moved to accept the application and testimony as presented with the condition that the brick sign be enlarged to the maximum size allowed by ordinance; Member Narcum seconded the motion. The commission recorded the motion as passing unanimously.

The meeting record lists four members present and shows the vote as unanimous. Member Waldron then moved to adjourn, Member Narcum seconded, and the meeting adjourned at 7:02 p.m.

The application is recorded as HPC #2026-1-1. The commission referenced the municipality's ordinance when setting the size condition; the transcript does not name the specific ordinance section.