Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Amphitheater Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Residents urge clearer rules, noise limits and signage at Dillon Amphitheater
Summary
Two residents told the council the town’s amphitheater lacks clear signage about smoking and marijuana use, and that amplified sound and operating decisions have harmed neighbors; they urged signage, independent acoustic review and greater transparency. Council took comments under advisement.
Several residents urged the Dillon Town Council on Monday to tighten rules and communication around the town-owned Dillon Amphitheater, citing smoke, noise and costs.
"We currently have inspections and searches similar to the TSA at the airports," said resident Len Smurlow, who gave his address as 11 Corinthian Circle. "But what about the use of cannabis or marijuana? No signs, no banners." Smurlow told the council he researched Amendment 64 and said public use of marijuana remains prohibited in public places; he recommended prominent signage and website updates stating that "no smoking of any type, including marijuana and vaping," is allowed.
Online commenter Carrie Don Solner thanked public works staff for recent park improvements but criticized amphitheater operations, saying the town-run venue is costly and has not engaged nearby residents. "The town-run amphitheater, while special, does not make the town money," Solner said, citing the 2025 audit and saying the facility "accounts for roughly 33% of town expenses while generating just 31% of revenue." She urged independent acoustic testing, clear maximum sound limits and more transparent, collaborative processes with neighbors.
Why it matters: The amphitheater is a town-owned, taxpayer-funded facility. Residents said unclear rules on smoking and amplified sound affect public health and livability, and they pressed the council for clearer standards and outreach.
Council response and next steps: Mayor Samuel and staff thanked both speakers and noted the council will take the comments into consideration. No formal policy change was proposed at the meeting; staff said they would accept written materials from Mr. Smurlow and will bring community concerns forward for follow-up. The council did not vote on any enforcement changes during the session.
What to watch for: Residents asked for (1) clearer, prominent signage and website notices about smoking and cannabis prohibitions; (2) independent acoustic testing and a published maximum sound limit; and (3) a transparent process for mitigating impacts on nearby renters and homeowners. Staff indicated they will review and respond at a future meeting or through staff follow-up.
