Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Electric Motorcycles topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council holds first reading on electric‑motorcycle ordinance to restrict sidewalk and trail use
Summary
The Enumclaw City Council heard the first reading of Ordinance No. 2839 June 22, which would define "electric motorcycles," ban their use on sidewalks, parks and multi‑use trails unless authorized, require helmets and safety equipment, and set operator and enforcement standards. It was presented as complementary to upcoming state guidance.
The Enumclaw City Council on June 22 held a first reading of Ordinance No. 2839, a proposed municipal code chapter that would define and regulate electric motorcycles, including high‑powered electric dirt bikes.
In a staff report, the police chief said the city lacks a clear municipal definition for these vehicles and that complaints have included high speeds in residential neighborhoods, operation on sidewalks and multi‑use trails, noise concerns, and near‑misses with pedestrians. “This regulatory gap creates ambiguity for riders, law enforcement, and the community regarding where and how these vehicles may be lawfully operated,” the chief said.
Key provisions described in the first reading: the ordinance would establish a definition distinguishing electric motorcycles from e‑bikes and mopeds based on power and speed capability; restrict operation on sidewalks, parks and multi‑use trails unless specifically authorized; require helmets and lighting consistent with state law; set minimum safety-equipment standards for roadway use; and require a valid driver’s license and age restrictions where appropriate. The proposal would also provide enforcement options including warnings, citations and impoundment for repeat or egregious violations.
Staff said the ordinance is intended to complement state law; the chief noted recent state legislation and a Department of Licensing workgroup created by substitute Senate Bill 6110, with an anticipated due date of October 2027, to develop state-level definitions and guidance.
Why it matters: councilmembers and staff framed the ordinance as a local public‑safety measure to clarify enforcement and reduce conflicts between pedestrians and higher‑powered electric devices. The first reading does not adopt the ordinance; councilmembers may propose amendments at second reading.
Next step: Ordinance No. 2839 was read by title and received its first reading. The city attorney's office reviewed the draft language, and the item will return for a second reading and additional council comment at a future meeting.
