Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Contracts Finance topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Hobart RDC approves change order, roundabout payment and register of claims totaling roughly $280,409

Hobart City Redevelopment Authority Meeting · March 16, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The commission approved Change Order No. 9 for a Colorado tracking project (about $6,688), a roundabout partial payment of $253,350, and a register of claims and requisitions; staff said the project remains under budget by roughly $64,000.

The Hobart Redevelopment Commission on March 16 approved several project payments and a contract change order, as staff reported ongoing progress and budget status for infrastructure projects.

Project manager (S3) described Change Order No. 9 for the Colorado tracking project as necessary because Nipsco relocated a service pole requiring a directional bore to reach an electrical junction; the cost for the change order was reported as $6,688.02. S3 said the overall project is approximately $64,000 under budget even after anticipated adjustments; commissioners moved and approved the change order by voice vote.

Staff also presented Payment 1 for the recently completed roundabout work and recommended authorizing $253,350 to the contractor for completed items, with a small punch list remaining. The commission moved, seconded and approved the payment.

On finance matters, staff presented the register of claims and invoices totaling $280,409.46, including supplemental funding for pre-filter station improvements, engineering support, and ALTA survey follow-up for Greenwood Center parcel purchases. Commissioners moved and approved the register by voice vote. The board also approved bond requisition items tied to the lease-rental bonds (requisition 76 and requisition 77), authorizing the RDC’s share of those payments as presented.

Why it matters: These actions advance multiple infrastructure projects the RDC is funding or supporting; staff framed the approvals as consistent with contracts and within projected budgets.

The meeting record did not include detailed roll-call tallies for the financial votes; all actions passed by voice vote with no recorded opposition.