Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Code Enforcement topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee presses enforcement on neglected, burned properties and a parcel washout dispute

Fountain City Zoning and Planning Committee · August 19, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Fountain City's zoning committee updated enforcement steps on a dilapidated structure, a burned building with heirs being contacted, a Highway 95 property under utility-bill review, and a disputed parcel washout; staff and members were assigned inspections, documentation and outreach.

The Zoning and Planning Committee reviewed several code-enforcement matters at its Aug. 19 meeting, assigning inspections, documentation and outreach for dilapidated and burned properties and for a washout dispute.

Members reported that a dilapidated building owner has been contacted and that an attorney had attempted to reach responsible parties for a burned building; committee minutes state heirs are being contacted and that Buffalo County inspection may pursue a warrant if needed. For a separate Highway 95 property, the committee directed staff to review utility bills for evidence of occupancy or usage, sign up staff (Gil) for training courses, and consider a contract inspector for current issues. Committee member Ben Adank was assigned to photograph the Highway 95 building and forward concerns to staff; members suggested the Mondovi ordinance as a model for enforcement language.

On a washout affecting parcels 226-00127-0000 and 226-00596-XXXX, Ben Adank reported visiting the site with staff member Gil and sending a letter to the recorded owner, who denies responsibility. Email contact was made with owner relatives (referred to in the minutes as "uncles"). Gil presented two repair options: repairing the feature to restore prior water flow or installing breaker rock/concrete; who will pay for remediation remains unresolved.

The committee did not take formal enforcement votes at the meeting but recorded follow-up steps: staff inspections, outreach to heirs and owners, photographic documentation, and review of other municipalities' ordinances to guide potential action.