Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Tourism Platform topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council hears Granicus (Simpleview) demo for a central Tomball tourism platform
Summary
Granicus (Simpleview) demonstrated a tourism CMS/CRM and partner portal to Tomball council on July 6; presenters highlighted event calendars, analytics integrations and a partner portal for businesses. Council asked staff to investigate scope, costs and funding (annual licensing cited at $23,100).
Tomball’s council on July 6 heard a remote presentation from Granicus (formerly Simpleview) on a combined content‑management and customer‑relationship platform designed to centralize event listings, destination marketing and partner outreach.
Andrew McLeod, an account executive for Granicus Destinations, led the demonstration and showed the platform’s event calendar, partner portal and CMS/CRM integration, saying the company is “trusted by over 1,000 destinations globally.” He described front‑end tools for mobile users, a password‑protected partner portal for businesses to update listings and an integrated CRM that pushes information from partner records to website content.
Council members pressed for details on how the system would be managed and paid for. Several asked whether businesses would have to pay to be listed and whether the site would be limited to events inside Tomball city limits. McLeod said the city could sponsor access so businesses would not have to pay and confirmed the product can be configured to accept community‑submitted events for staff review before publishing. He also disclosed a pricing structure of one‑time implementation costs plus an annual licensing fee; he cited an annual cost of $23,100 during the presentation.
Residents and chamber representatives said a centralized calendar would help community outreach and visitorship. Bruce Hellaguyce, president and CEO of the Greater Tomball Chamber, told the council the chamber would be willing to partner but said the chamber needed board discussion before committing funds or exclusive participation.
Mayor Quinn asked whether the council wanted staff to investigate further on scope, licensing, and who would manage the content; council members signaled general support to pursue additional information and pricing options. Staff said they would return with more detail on budget implications, whether the hotel/motel tax or grant funds might apply and whether a city staff member or the chamber would operate the system.
Next steps: staff will gather cost and implementation details and return to council for a policy and budget decision.
