Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Town Center Overlay topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Greenland Planning Board narrows Town Center overlay, sets 10,000-sq.-ft. minimum lot size
Summary
At a March 5 work session the Greenland Planning Board agreed to include seven parcels in a proposed Town Center Overlay District, set a 10,000-square-foot minimum lot size to limit density, and directed staff to circulate a revised ordinance draft for review on April 2.
The Greenland Planning Board on March 5 agreed to narrow the boundaries of a proposed Town Center Overlay District and to raise the overlay’s minimum lot size to 10,000 square feet.
The action followed a lengthy discussion of which parcels should be eligible for the overlay. Chair Bob Dion opened the work session; after debate the Board agreed to include Lots 2, 3, 4, 14, 30, 31 and 37 and to exclude Lots 1 and 32A because of limited frontage and wetland constraints. Members described the overlay as beginning at the Dunkin’ plaza on Portsmouth Avenue at the Rt. 33 intersection, continuing onto Portsmouth Avenue at the Post Road intersection and ending at Tuttle Lane; Post Road itself will not be included.
Why it matters: Board members said the change is intended to concentrate potential commercial and higher-density residential development in parcels with adequate frontage and infrastructure while protecting constrained parcels from inappropriate development. Several members urged caution about environmental constraints and visual impacts; supporters of inclusion said Lot 14 would allow additional residential density and commercial opportunity.
The Board also discussed design standards for buildings in the overlay — including preferred materials (brick and other specified materials), window and door styles, roof materials and garage orientation — and removed or clarified ambiguous language about blending historic New England and modern designs. Staff said those edits will be incorporated into a revised ordinance draft.
Procedural next steps: Member Morris Goodman moved to continue discussion to the work session on Thursday, April 2, 2026, to allow the Board to review the revised draft; the motion was seconded by John McDevitt and carried unanimously. Board members also noted that property owners in the proposed overlay should be notified and that the Town Attorney may need to be consulted to reduce litigation risk. The Board emphasized that only lots meeting frontage and underlying zoning criteria would benefit from commercial uses under the overlay.
