Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Accessory Structure Variance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Homewood BZA approves small therapy pool variance for family with disabled child
Summary
The Homewood Board of Zoning Adjustments approved a variance to allow a 15-by-15 therapy pool for a local family whose son has cerebral palsy, with the board finding the property's existing garage and lot constraints created a hardship; neighbors present voiced support.
Get email alerts on the Accessory Structure Variance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Homewood Board of Zoning Adjustments on July 9 approved a variance allowing a 15-by-15 in-ground therapy pool so the petitioner's son can receive aquatic therapy at home.
David Lorberbaum, a landscape architect with Lorberbaum McNair and Associates, told the board the petition seeks roughly an additional 105 square feet for the pool and that the property's existing garage limits the amount of accessory-structure area the family may use under the ordinance. He said the proposed pool would keep the site's impervious coverage within code thresholds (about 44.6 percent) and that the request was driven by functional need rather than convenience.
Homeowner John S. Ash, who identified himself as the petitioner and a longtime community member, described his son's medical history and therapy needs, saying the pool "is one of the few activities that bring him great joy" and that the 15-by-15 size is the minimum needed to allow a caregiver or therapist to work with him. The family submitted a medical letter from Dr. Jan Rao documenting the need and said neighbors had been notified and provided support.
A neighbor, Sally Elwood, told the board she and her husband support the request and urged approval. After hearing the presentation and public comments, a board member moved to approve BZA-26-0034; the members voting on the case recorded affirmative votes and the chair announced the variance had been approved.
The board noted the typical lapse provision for variances and a staff reminder that approved parties have one year to pull permits.
The decision was procedural and did not include additional conditions beyond the usual permit timeline noted by staff.

