Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Curriculum Ela topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board approves DCIP and school plans; district recommends Art Core and ARC toolkit for ELA after review
Summary
The board approved the District Comprehensive Improvement Plan and school plans pending state acceptance and heard a curriculum review recommending Art Core for K–6, an ARC intervention toolkit for K–8 and pilots of Think Circa in grades 6–8, emphasizing culturally responsive texts and stronger vertical alignment.
The Albany City School District’s executive team presented the District Comprehensive Improvement Plan (DCIP) and related School Improvement Plans (SIPs), describing a state‑guided process that prioritized equity, instructional coherence and attendance strategies tied to recently adopted child safety zones. Presenters said the state education department had accepted the plan earlier that day pending the board’s approval.
After a Q&A — during which board members asked about survey participation, Giffin’s receivership status (confirmed as year 1 of 2) and how progress would be monitored — the board voted to approve the DCIP and SIPs. The recorded outcome was unanimous approval with a single dissenting vote by member Wolfgreen.
Separately, the district presented a comprehensive K–12 English Language Arts review and recommendations. The review found that elementary foundational skills work has improved ELA proficiency at the elementary level (presenters cited an increase from 26% to 43% proficiency) but identified gaps in vertical alignment and cultural representation of texts. The curriculum team recommended replacing the Wonders core for K–5 with a knowledge‑building program (Art Core recommended for K–6), adopting the ARC toolkit for K–8 interventions aligned to the science of reading, piloting Think Circa for grades 6–8, and refining 9–12 units to be more student‑centered. The team emphasized professional learning, monitoring of implementation, and student voice in selecting texts.
Board members raised questions about overscaffolding, how the curriculum will work in multi‑age (Montessori) and dual‑language settings, and an acceleration pilot allowing high‑achieving 8th graders to take English 10; presenters described monitoring and professional learning to address differentiation and shared plans to gather student input on texts.
Next steps included implementation planning, professional development over the summer, and follow‑up reporting to the board.
