Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the River Access topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners debate ways to connect downtown Scottsville to the James River
Summary
Planning commissioners reviewed options to improve pedestrian connections from downtown to the James River, including a bridge-to-levee stair, at-grade crossings, and negotiated easements through private parcels; members flagged regulatory and cost constraints and suggested starting with lower-cost path improvements.
Lincoln, a planning commission member who presented slides and maps, told the commission that Scottsville does not own land directly adjacent to the James River and that railroad tracks are the primary barrier to pedestrian access. "Scottsville as a town does not own any land adjacent to the James River," Lincoln said, noting that the DWR boat ramp is the only public land on the riverfront.
Commissioners discussed two main connection ideas: formalizing an informal path near the pump house and pursuing a more substantial connection from the Route 20 bridge to the levee. Lincoln said an at-grade connection or improved path around the pump house could be strengthened with pavement and cleanup, while a staircase off the bridge on the far side of the CSX tracks would be a large, costly undertaking requiring structural independence from the bridge and engineering to resist flood forces.
Commissioners recalled prior student sketches and small-area planning work that considered tunnels or stairways; one commissioner said the Route 20 bridge is "the most underutilized infrastructure we have" and that a stair or walkway could funnel downtown pedestrians to the levee. Participants flagged regulatory constraints tied to the railroad and flooding risks and emphasized safety considerations for the pump house area.
The commission also discussed property easements as a way to build connections without acquiring riverfront land. Lincoln and other members identified a candidate parcel (property ID provided in the meeting as 130-81-42 / 130A1-42) and suggested beginning negotiations with a single owner—utilities or phone-company properties such as CenturyLink were mentioned as potential first steps toward a linked route.
Commissioners agreed the comp plan should capture existing ideas and past research so future residents and officials do not have to start from scratch. As next steps they recommended noting the bridge/levee and Ferry Street connections in the comp plan as items for further study, pursuing early, low-cost improvements to existing informal paths, and beginning conversations about easements with adjacent property owners and relevant utilities.
