Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Construction And Permits topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Eaton County committee advances construction permit fee changes after heated debate over retroactivity
Summary
Commissioners debated new construction-permit fees and whether to refund applicants for recent permits; after arguments about fairness and administrative burden, the committee voted to move the proposal forward with an August 1 effective date and no retroactive refunds, to be finalized at the August board meeting.
Eaton County's Ways & Means Committee advanced a proposed revision to the county construction-code fee schedule but not before a prolonged debate over whether fee cuts should be applied retroactively to summer permits.
Chris, the county's construction-code official, presented a package of changes that replaces some square-foot charges with flat fees (for example, decks) and reduces other review fees, saying the intent was to lower costs and simplify permitting. "By doing that on the decks...the flat fee will end up being $200," he said, adding that the changes aim to lower costs to customers and simplify the permit process.
Commissioner Shaver pressed for effective-date flexibility and asked whether the board could make the changes retroactive to June 1; Chris and administration warned that identifying and refunding impacted permit holders would be labor-intensive. Commissioner Wright suggested a September 1 effective date to give the public notice. Commissioner Haskell said he preferred to see the full package and financial projections before making a retroactive decision.
A roll-call test vote early in the discussion failed to produce the board's consensus on retroactivity, but a subsequent motion to move the recommended fee schedule forward with an August 1 effective date and no refunds was moved, supported and passed by the committee, which directed staff to bring the full package to the August board meeting for final action and to include fiscal-impact projections.
Administrators said staff would also prepare an analysis of the number of permits impacted between June 1 and the proposed effective date so the board could revisit refunds later if desired. The committee also approved a separate request from the department to restructure inspector staffing (consolidating two part-time contract inspectors into one full-time plumbing/mechanical inspector) and forwarded that proposal as well.
The item now goes to the full board with the committee recommendation for an Aug. 1 effective date, associated fee schedules and the staff fiscal analysis.
