Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Evansville council approves Windmill Ridge subdivision and land-divider agreement; one abstention
Summary
The Evansville Common Council approved Land Division Application 2024-04 (Windmill Ridge First Addition) and the related land divider—s agreement after amending the staff-recommended motion; the votes recorded 6-0-1 with Alderperson Joe Geoffrion abstaining.
The Evansville Common Council approved a preliminary and final subdivision plat for Windmill Ridge First Addition (Land Division Application 2024-04) and authorized the related land divider's agreement during a special meeting on May 28, 2024.
Alderperson Cory Neeley moved to approve the land division application for parcel 6-27-559.5403 with the conditions in the staff report. Community Development Director Colette Spranger summarized the staff report and noted that the Plan Commission had removed the last sentence of the recommended motion. Alderperson Jim Brooks seconded Neeley—s motion. Neeley then moved to amend the motion to strike the last sentence of the staff report's recommended motion; Brooks seconded. The amendment passed with a recorded tally of 6 yes, 0 no and 1 abstention (Alderperson Joe Geoffrion).
After the amendment, the council approved the revised motion to accept the preliminary and final subdivision plat for Windmill Ridge First Addition. The minutes record the vote as 6-0-1, with Geoffrion abstaining. Immediately afterward, Neeley moved to approve the Land Divider's Agreement that accompanies the Windmill Ridge First Addition; Brooks seconded. That motion also passed by roll call 6-0-1, with Geoffrion abstaining.
The minutes do not record formal public comments on the item. Mayor Dianne Duggan opened and closed the meeting on schedule; the council set its next regular meeting for Monday, June 10, 2024, at 6:00 p.m.
The records in these minutes identify the applicant and developer as part of the meeting attendance but do not list conditions or text of the land divider's agreement in full; details referenced in the staff report and Plan Commission recommendation that were struck are noted only as "the last sentence" of the recommended motion in the staff report.
