Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Park Infrastructure topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Park board approves Option 2 for Meadows Park playground, citing accessibility and long‑term maintenance savings
Summary
The Hudson Park Board voted to approve option 2 for a Meadows Park playground, a $169,790 design that includes poured‑in‑place surfacing. Board members cited accessibility and lower long‑term maintenance despite higher upfront cost; individual vote counts were not recorded in the transcript.
The Hudson Park Board voted to approve option 2 for the Meadows Park playground, selecting a design priced in the meeting discussion at $169,790 that includes a 24×24 shelter and poured‑in‑place rubber surfacing. The motion was made by S4 and seconded by S5; Chair Chuck Jerran called for the ayes and declared the motion approved by voice vote. The transcript does not record individual vote tallies.
Board discussion before the motion focused on equipment age ranges, accessibility and surface tradeoffs. Staff presented three options targeted at ages 5–12; two option prices were read aloud (one at about $160,000 and option 2 at $169,790); the third option's quoted number was unclear in the transcript and therefore is not reported here. Staff noted poured‑in‑place surfacing (included in the quotes) carries a higher upfront cost (about $72,000 was cited for the surfacing component) but reduces ongoing maintenance compared with engineered wood fiber, which staff estimated at roughly $15,000–$20,000 for materials and more frequent replenishment.
Funding: staff said the project would come from Park Trust B (the South of I‑94 park impact funds) and reported a current balance in that account of $500,959. Board members estimated additional site work (concrete pads, sidewalks and site trees) could require roughly $40,000–$60,000 more depending on the option chosen; staff said they would solicit concrete contractor quotes as part of implementation planning.
What happened at the meeting: after presentation and discussion the board made a motion to select option 2 (mover: S4; second: S5) and the chair declared the motion approved by voice vote. The transcript records "All those in favor, say aye" and "Approved" but does not list roll call vote counts or member-by-member votes.
Next steps: staff said they will obtain contractor quotes for the concrete work and finalize procurement details; project funding and implementation timing will be brought back to the board as staff develops the park improvement schedule and coordinates with the CIP.
Source: staff presentation and board motion during the Hudson Park Board meeting.
