Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Comment Special Education topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Parent alleges special-education failures; nonprofit offers anti-bullying partnership in public comment
Summary
During public comment, Annette Walker introduced a new nonprofit offering anti-bullying programs and Ro Faranda alleged long-standing special-education record and service failures affecting her son; the board recorded the comments but took no formal action at the meeting.
Two public commenters addressed student-safety and special-education concerns during the July 8 Maricopa Unified School District meeting.
Annette Walker introduced herself as “the founder and president of a new nonprofit in Arizona called Advocate Monster Truck,” and urged the district to take bullying seriously. Walker said roughly “one in five high school students” in Arizona report bullying on school property and offered her nonprofit as a resource to help the district develop programs and supports. She said she would follow up with the board and provide program updates.
Ro Faranda delivered a separate, extended public comment alleging specific failures in her son’s special-education services. Faranda said she requested a new multidisciplinary evaluation team (MET) and related reports and that district responses had not met the timelines she cited in federal and state special-education guidance. She alleged that reports the district produced simply copied material from a private neuropsychological report she had provided, and she asserted that staff in the health office were not seizure-trained and had twice changed her son’s seizure-action plan without her consent. Faranda said those failures had made it difficult for other schools to accept her son and that she was “sick of attempting to work with serial sugarcoaters.”
The chair read the board's public-comment rules at the start of the period, including limits on board discussion under state open-meeting law and the board's options to respond (study the matter, direct staff to investigate, or schedule the issue for a future agenda). The transcript records the public comments but does not show the board taking immediate remedial action during the meeting. Staff follow-up, if any, was not recorded on the public record at that time.
