Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Appeals Variance Grosse topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board of Appeals denies variance for structure at 110 Palisade Court and upholds removal order

Village of Merrimac · June 10, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Board of Appeals denied an 8-foot variance request from Kerry Grosse and Mary Ripp after they were issued a stop-work order for constructing an attached structure within the 10-foot side-yard setback; the Board upheld the administrative removal order and the $150 red tag fine.

The Village of Merrimac Board of Appeals heard an appeal June 16 from Kerry Grosse and Mary Ripp seeking an 8-foot variance for a structure built at 110 Palisade Court. Grosse said he initially intended to build a lean-to next to his garage but the work expanded into a larger attached structure. Village Building Inspector Matt Paske issued a stop-work order after finding that a 12-by-35-foot attached garage had been constructed 8 feet into the village’s 10-foot side-yard setback.

Administrator Jennie Klecker informed the Board that a red-tag fine of $150 was issued for failure to obtain a building permit prior to construction. The Board reviewed a supporting letter from John Holzbauer, president of the Merrimac Landing Condominium Owners Association, which favored the variance, and a letter from Wisconsin & Southern Railroad (an adjacent landowner) urging denial and immediate removal of the unauthorized structure.

On motions from Amy Buffardi and Cheryl Anderson the Board denied the 8-foot variance and upheld the administrative removal order; both votes were recorded as unanimous. The minutes state the owner must remove the unlawful structure in accordance with the administrative order.

The Board of Appeals adjourned at 5:57 p.m. following the decision. The minutes do not record a timetable for removal or further enforcement steps beyond the upheld order.