Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Transparency Tif topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Caledonia trustees split over plan to rebut alleged TIF misinformation
Summary
Trustees debated whether to direct staff to compile and publish corrections to alleged inaccuracies circulating about the village's Tax Incremental Financing (TIF) districts. The board approved an amended motion to collect the alleged inaccuracies and return the matter after the election for further review.
Caledonia's village board spent the bulk of its March 2 meeting debating whether to respond publicly to what the president described as inaccurate information circulating on social media about the village's Tax Incremental Financing districts.
The president asked staff to gather examples of what he called 'inaccurate information' and sought permission to publish factual corrections before the upcoming election. Several trustees pushed back, saying the agenda item lacked specificity and that the board could not direct a public response without seeing the alleged misrepresentations.
'We don't see what it is that's considered objectionable,' a trustee said during the discussion, arguing the board needed a list of specific claims before acting. Another trustee said the village should provide a clear, numbers-based educational summary prepared by staff or finance consultants for public distribution, but that any draft should come back to the board for approval.
Trustees debated legal and procedural limits: some raised First Amendment concerns and cautioned that the board should not be perceived as trying to censor opinion; others said staff had expressed concern for staff safety and that clarifying factual TID numbers could be appropriate public information.
After extended discussion the board approved a motion, as amended, to have trustees or staff compile the alleged inaccuracies and return that compilation to the board at a later meeting (the amendment moved the report to after the election). The motion passed on a roll call vote. The board did not publish rebuttals at the meeting.
What the board asked staff to produce, supporters said, should be factual and succinct: real numbers, plain explanations of what a TID does, and comparisons of present finances versus original project projections so taxpayers can better understand impacts. Opponents said the board first needed to see the specific items being labeled 'inaccurate' before authorizing staff time to prepare materials.
The board concluded the item by directing that either trustees or staff bring the alleged inaccuracies back for a future meeting; members noted that personnel-related concerns or specific allegations that might implicate privacy could require different handling.
