Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Facility Maintenance topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee member presents electrical quote; board agrees to accept contractor estimate

Washburn Park Board · May 15, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The board reviewed an electrical quote from Weber for about $1,000 to label panels, produce diagrams and address internal corrosion. The committee member recommended proceeding and the board voiced informal acceptance; the item will move forward for scheduling and any additional quotes if further work is required.

Board members reviewed a contractor estimate for electrical work at park facilities and agreed to proceed with the vendor’s work order.

A committee member presented a quote from Weber (spelled in transcript as Weber/Webber) that he said "looks like 1000 dollars" for a job the contractor described as relabeling circuits, producing a panel diagram and addressing internal corrosion. The member said the initial proposal is meant to identify and label the electrical panel and that a follow-up quote would be produced if additional repairs or replacements are needed.

The member said the work is necessary because the facility’s electrical panels are unlabeled; he asked the contractor to perform a diagnostic walk-through and produce a diagram so the board can prioritize any further corrective work. The member asked whether the estimate included a meter replacement; he said it did not and that the quote was for a first pass at labeling and diagnosis.

When the member asked for a motion, the group voiced support. The board accepted the estimate by consensus and agreed to have the contractor perform the initial diagnostic and labeling work, with the understanding that further repairs would be quoted separately.

The decision was procedural rather than a recorded roll-call vote; the board indicated informal acceptance and planned next steps for scheduling the contractor visit.