Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Ordinance 114 95 topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning panel backs ordinance to allow vehicles on paved driveways, declines time-limit amendments
Summary
After debate about aesthetics and enforcement, the commission recommended to council an amendment (referred to in the meeting as 114-95) that permits certain vehicles on paved front-yard driveways; proposed time-limit amendments (three months and 30 days) failed and the commission emphasized enforcement will be handled through existing processes.
The Columbus Plan Commission recommended that city council adopt an amendment to an outdoor-storage ordinance (referred to in the meeting as "114-95") to allow vehicles, including recreational vehicles and watercraft, to be parked on a paved driveway in the front yard, while retaining other size limits.
Mike (staff member) told the commission the change would allow parking on paved driveways but would not affect street-parking regulations governed by other code sections. "This allows people to park in the front yard, but only on a paved driveway," Mike said, and staff noted the proposal retains a 35-foot maximum size that existed previously.
Commissioners debated aesthetic concerns and enforceability. One committee member suggested limiting the allowance to short periods (examples discussed included 72 hours or a three-month summer window) and requiring items to be "road ready." Another commissioner argued enforcement of existing ordinances is already spotty and cautioned against adding rules that would be hard to enforce.
A motion to consider and take action on the amendment as written was made. An amendment proposing a three-month limit failed for lack of a second. A separate amendment proposing a 30-day limit was seconded and put to a voice vote; the amendment failed. After those votes the commission approved a motion to recommend the ordinance amendment to council as written. The meeting transcript records voice votes but does not list individual vote tallies.
The ordinance recommendation will be forwarded to city council for final consideration; commissioners indicated detailed time limits and enforcement procedures could be worked out in the comprehensive zoning code rewrite.
