Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Housing Production Plan topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Regional planner presents Dighton housing production plan; selectmen ask edits and state prereview
Summary
SERPed presented a final draft Housing Production Plan for Dighton, reporting about 200 survey responses and recommending two goals and four strategies; the board asked SERPed to incorporate planning-board edits and to send the draft to the state for a prereview before formal local adoption.
SERPed, the regional planning agency, presented a final draft Housing Production Plan to the Dighton Board of Selectmen and answered questions about outreach, data and next steps.
"My name is Taylor Perez. I'm the director of housing and research at SERPed," Taylor Perez said, describing roughly 200 responses to a community preferences survey. SERPed summarized two goals—support housing options for vulnerable populations and increase subsidized-housing-eligible units to help communities meet the Commonwealth's Chapter 40B thresholds—and four broad strategies: review local comprehensive permit rules; conduct additional public outreach; pursue funding and regulatory changes; and investigate adaptive reuse of underused municipal land.
Board members pushed back on how representative the voluntary survey was. One selectman said the town’s roughly 3,000 households meant 202 responses were ‘‘less than 10%’’ of households and questioned how many responses were substantive. SERPed acknowledged coverage concerns but said the responses were robust and that voluntary surveys commonly face such limits. "We try to thread the needle and draw some consensus," Perez said, noting the outreach also included tabling events and targeted engagement.
SERPed outlined local-adoption options and recommended an optional prereview by the state's housing office to reduce the chance of substantive post-adoption edits. Perez estimated the state's prereview typically takes about one to two months and said most comments are minor—requests for an added data point or clarifying sentence—rather than wholesale revisions.
Selectmen indicated they were comfortable with SERPed incorporating the planning-board memorandum edits and returning the updated draft for review. The board authorized SERPed to make those edits, submit the draft to the state for prereview, and return with a summary of any state feedback before a formal local adoption vote.
What happens next: SERPed will revise the draft to reflect planning-board comments, request the state's prereview, and brief the selectmen when the state responds. If the state requests only minor clarifications, SERPed said the town can move to a formal adoption that starts a five-year period during which the plan guides housing policy and can provide regulatory benefits under Chapter 40B.
