Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Stormwater topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners discuss $400,000 culvert fix on Vowell Avenue as part of BRIC grant application
Summary
County staff told commissioners the culvert under Vowell Avenue now receives public drainage and must be improved; staff estimate the fix at roughly $400,000 and said work could be funded via a BRIC grant and the county’s stormwater utility.
County staff and commissioners spent an extended portion of the agenda review discussing a proposed Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities (BRIC) grant application to address an undersized culvert beneath Vowell (alternately spelled Vowel in packet) Avenue.
A staff member responsible for stormwater engineering said the culvert now receives public drainage and "has to be improved because it receives not just drainage from the subdivision but from public drainage," and that upstream development has increased flows.
Commissioner Zappel and other commissioners pressed staff on precedent and responsibility, noting that the pipe's current capacity appeared insufficient: one commissioner estimated the existing structure could handle about "50 cubic feet per second" while a two‑year storm might generate about "195 cubic feet per second." The county manager and staff said that private roads in some cases provide public benefit and that the county’s stormwater utility exists to handle such drainage responsibilities when public drainage is implicated.
Staff estimated the improvement would cost about $400,000. Commissioners raised concerns about whether the homeowners association or developer should contribute and whether undertaking the work sets a precedent; staff said the culvert's current insufficiency is largely a result of later upstream development and that the county's stormwater program is intended to address those responsibilities.
The conversation also included operational notes about how the county distinguishes private roads that are strictly private from non‑DOT private roads that provide public benefit and how staff will provide additional context in follow‑up materials. The board did not take a final vote during the agenda review but discussed the grant application and the technical and policy considerations.
Ending: Staff will return the project as part of the grant application process and provide additional details on responsibility, scope and funding at a future meeting.
