Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zoning Density topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Candidates cautious but pragmatic on county and state density proposals
Summary
When asked about Montgomery County and state proposals to change single‑family zoning, candidates said higher density is likely to arrive in some form; they urged preparation, infrastructure readiness, and a focus on real affordability rather than density for its own sake.
Moderators asked how candidates would respond if Montgomery County or the state pursued code changes to allow more multifamily housing or townhouses in single‑family areas. The candidates’ answers ranged from preparing and defending local interests to planning how the village could adapt if higher density proposals arrive.
Jeff Blander said the council must remain vigilant and work with county and state officials, characterizing recent proposals as an ongoing “whack‑a‑mole” of policy changes that require continuous attention. Mark Schammel said higher density is coming and the village should start preparing; he urged finding ways to shape positive outcomes rather than reflexively opposing change.
Matt Kanter and others emphasized that density does not automatically produce affordability in a high‑cost area like Martin's Additions; Kanter suggested that density near transit and commercial nodes makes more sense and that infrastructure constraints must be addressed before approving significant new housing types.
Candidates broadly favored engagement, study, and working with residents and higher‑level governments rather than sweeping local bans; they stressed the need to protect village infrastructure and green space while responding to regional housing pressures.
