Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Subdivision Sd 0226 topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Albany County planning commission recommends approval of Range Echo subdivision with conditions

alternate county planning and zoning commission · July 9, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Albany County alternate planning and zoning commission on July 8 recommended that the Board of County Commissioners approve the Range Echo subdivision (SD 0226), subject to financial assurance equal to 125% of construction costs and written approval from Albany County Fire District No. 1 confirming adequate fire suppression water.

The Albany County alternate planning and zoning commission on July 8 recommended that the Board of County Commissioners approve the Range Echo subdivision application (SD 0226), adopting staff findings and with conditions that require financial assurance and a fire‑district approval before the board considers final plat approval.

Planning staff David introduced the final plat for property at 83 Littleworth Lane, describing a proposed 11‑lot subdivision on about 131.2 acres with lot sizes of roughly 10 to 20 acres. David said there is no proposed centralized water system; lots would rely on individual wells or hauled water and on‑site septic systems. He noted a Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) comment that wells completed in the Chugwater formation "may contain elevated concentrations of total dissolved solids and sulfates," and said the applicant is securing related water‑rights paperwork and is working with Albany County Fire District No. 1 on a fire suppression plan.

Why it matters: the commission’s recommendation moves the application to the Board of County Commissioners for a final decision. The conditions the commission attached — financial assurance and confirmation from the fire district that an alternative water resource is adequate — are prerequisites for the BOCC’s review and could affect whether the subdivision proceeds as proposed.

Commissioners asked staff detailed questions about road ownership, covenants and enforcement, fencing and wildlife protections, and the timeline for receiving agency responses. David said the access would be from Littleworth Lane and a new Bigworth Lane that would terminate in a cul‑de‑sac and that roads would remain private and be maintained by a homeowners association. "These will be private roads. Completely private," David said, adding that private roads could be gated and limited to subdivision residents.

A public commenter questioned the quality of DEQ’s analysis for the site. Commissioner (S2), who identified his professional background in hydrology during the meeting, said he was not asserting the subdivision posed a health hazard but described the DEQ response as "utterly unresponsive" and said he would pursue technical concerns through professional channels; he also said the concerns were not sufficient to block the application.

After discussion, Commissioner (S4) moved that the commission recommend the BOCC approve Range Echo subdivision (SD 0226) "adopting and incorporating the staff analysis, findings of fact and conclusions of law," with the explicit conditions that the fire‑department response be submitted before BOCC consideration and that financial assurance be provided. The motion was seconded and passed by roll call; the recorded votes in the meeting were unanimous (Barb: yes; Rolf: yes; Greg: yes; Vern: yes; chair: yes).

The commission’s recommendation does not itself grant final plat approval; the matter will next appear before the Board of County Commissioners, which must confirm that the stated conditions have been satisfied.

Clarifying details noted at the meeting: the staff report lists financial assurance at 125% of estimated construction costs as a condition; the applicant proposes on‑site septic systems and individual wells (or hauled water); WYDOT requested a traffic‑generation estimate to determine whether further traffic review is required; staff identified that certain consumer disclosures (for example, "no centralized water system") are expected to appear on advertising materials as well as the plat. Staff also noted a preliminary agreement with a neighboring subdivision concerning access and that a water‑rights assignment is in process to assign irrigation well rights to Lot 11.