Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Council Votes topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Votes at a glance: council approves consent calendar, professional services contracts, waste‑billing resolution and Skyline Heights plan
Summary
At its July 1 meeting, Corona City Council passed the consent calendar and approved professional services agreements, a resolution placing delinquent solid‑waste charges on the property tax roll, and the Skyline Heights specific plan (with an added condition to dedicate 43 acres). The council also continued a zoning amendment to Aug. 19.
Get email alerts on the Council Votes topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Corona City Council recorded several final actions and votes at its July 1 meeting. Key outcomes:
- Consent calendar: Council approved routine consent items (all items except those pulled for comment) by a 5‑0 voice vote.
- Item 6.5 (professional services agreement): After public comment raising concerns about RSO and RSG and disclosure of mobile‑home rent data, the council moved and passed the professional services agreement (item 6.5).
- Item 6.6 (professional services agreement): A separate professional services item was moved, seconded and approved by a 5‑0 vote after public comment requesting procurement transparency.
- Item 8.1 (zone text amendment on water‑efficient landscaping and fencing): Council opened the public hearing and voted to continue the item to the second Council meeting in August (Aug. 19) to allow additional review and avoid re‑noticing.
- Item 8.2 (resolution confirming replacement of delinquent solid‑waste charges on the property tax roll): Utilities Director Tom Moody and a Waste Management representative outlined the process for placing accounts more than 90 days past due on the tax roll (with outreach and payment‑plan options available). The council adopted the resolution by a 5‑0 vote.
- Item 8.3 (Skyline Heights specific plan and EIR addendum): Council approved the addendum and the revised specific plan, and on an amended motion added a condition requiring dedication of the 43 acres shown in the project’s blue shading; the motion passed 5‑0.
Where the record includes vote tallies, the council voted unanimously (5‑0) on the consent calendar and the items noted above; where individual roll‑call votes were not read on the record, the minutes record a unanimous voice vote. Several items had robust public comment and follow‑up directions to staff.

