Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Historic Preservation topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Commission probes window materials and profile for Queens Point renovation at 748 East Front Street

New Bern Historic Preservation Commission · July 7, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The commission reviewed a window‑replacement submittal for 748 East Front Street (Queens Point); staff said the applicant can request the HPC discuss the item without attendance, but commissioners requested sash profile details and whether proposed materials match those available when the building was constructed before deciding if the work is 'minor' or requires a hearing.

Commissioners reviewed a design‑review submission for 748 East Front Street (Queens Point) at the July work session. Staff said the applicant was not present but had requested the HPC discuss the proposal without them; commissioners agreed to review drawings and determine if the change could be handled administratively or required a hearing.

The central question was material and profile compatibility: the existing windows are wood, while the applicant proposed a modern material. Staff noted that the test is whether the proposed material type was available at the time the building was constructed; the building date on record was 1997, and staff said the proposed material was available in 1995, which could meet the ‘‘available at the time built’’ guideline. Commissioners pressed for clarification of sash profile, muntin (shadow‑bar) depth and whether grills would be permanently between glass, because those three‑dimensional details affect perceived congruence.

Because window profile and shadow‑bar details were not clearly described on the submission, staff asked the applicant to clarify the grill configuration and the sash profile before the matter proceeds to hearing. Commissioners also discussed whether the minor‑works list should be updated in future to allow certain window replacements by staff to reduce back‑and‑forth for routine replacements, but deferred that policy change for a future meeting.