Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Finance Audit topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Auditors report clean opinion but flag material adjustments, $465,000 wind-farm shortfall
Summary
External auditors told the Corona Municipal Schools board they issued an unmodified opinion on FY24 financials but recorded a $4,504 prior‑year restatement and about $97,000 in accrued payables; auditors also reported compliance findings including a $465,000 deficit tied to the district's wind‑farm project.
Joe Ortiz, the audit manager for the firm that completed the districtaudit, presented required communications to the board and said the firm issued an unmodified (clean) opinion on the districtfinancial statements for fiscal year 2024.
Ortiz said the audit required a small restatement: "We had a restatement of $4,504 in the governments that was supposed to be recorded prior year," and identified an additional accrual of accounts payable of approximately $97,000 that should have been recorded as of June 30, 2024. He described those items as timing and accounting-period issues tied to the districttransition from cash to an accrual/modified basis of accounting, not evidence of fraud: "These are accounting function issues and not necessarily something related to fraud," Ortiz said.
In addition to those corrected misstatements, Ortiz told trustees the auditors must report state audit compliance findings even when amounts are small. He identified repeated state audit rule findings for expenditures exceeding budget authority in specific funds and described a more significant cash-appropriations finding: "There was a budget deficit of $465,000 in the wind farm project," Ortiz said, noting that shortfall contributed to cash-availability problems in certain funds (food services was named among affected funds).
Trustees asked staff for more documentation explaining how the district computed bar graphs and aggregate figures that appear in the budget packet; Ortiz said auditors trace selected samples and cannot disclose their materiality thresholds for security reasons. He also told the board the firm will provide formal drafts to management and that the state auditor must issue a release letter before the reports become public.
Ortiz closed by noting the audit teamrelationship: this engagement was the firm's eighth year with the district and the auditors described the need for a successor auditor for FY25 per rotation rules. "We really did appreciate the partnership we had with people all over the last years," Ortiz said.
What happens next: staff and auditors will circulate the draft reports to the board once the state auditor releases the final letter; trustees asked that printed or electronic copies be made available to members. The board also directed staff to provide additional backup on the budget and the wind‑farm BAR that was discussed earlier in the meeting.
Provenance: first presented by Joe Ortiz during the audit presentation (topicintro: SEG 1087); auditor remarks and Q&A concluded with the auditor leaving the virtual meeting (topfinish: SEG 2011).
