Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Code Enforcement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Resident urges action on dilapidated properties; council reviews legal limits and costs
Summary
A resident urged the council to address overgrown lots and unsafe buildings, suggesting adding mowing charges to water bills; staff and the building official explained that enforcement requires certified notice and court action, with an approximate legal cost of $3,000 per property.
Get email alerts on the Code Enforcement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
During public comment, resident Carly urged the city to act on dilapidated properties, noting weeds and the condition of the creamery and asking whether costs for mowing or razing could be added to water bills (she suggested about $3 per month) to encourage compliance.
City Clerk and staff explained the limits of administrative enforcement: the building official can perform exterior inspections and send certified notices, but forcing compliance often requires legal proceedings through the court system. Staff said previous outreach has been done and that roughly 20 properties were identified for attention. The building official’s services beyond routine inspections would incur additional fees in the official’s contract, and staff estimated legal expenses of about $3,000 per property to pursue court action.
Council members discussed prioritizing the properties and directed staff to prepare a recommended list and cost estimates. The council did not take immediate legal action at the meeting but discussed creating a subcommittee or directing staff to begin the defined legal steps once the priority list is approved.
Next steps: staff will coordinate with the building official to produce a prioritized list of properties, and council may direct staff and the city attorney to initiate certified notices and court filings on a prioritized set of properties.

