Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Flood Buyout topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Ladue council reviews 7 Trails End flood-buyout after FEMA recalculation raises local cost

City Council of the City of Ladue, St. Louis County, Missouri · May 18, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

City staff told the council updated FEMA Benefit-Cost Ratio calculations and an increased appraisal raised the estimated project cost to about $874,860, producing a local funding gap of roughly $201,498; council directed staff to contact the homeowner and indicated a cap of a 25% city share (about $227,000).

During the May 18 council meeting, City staff reported that an updated appraisal and revised FEMA Benefit-Cost Ratio (BCR) calculations altered the financial outlook for a proposed voluntary buyout at 7 Trails End.

Staff advised that, under the updated FEMA methodology, the project no longer met the minimum BCR threshold as originally modeled. To maintain a 1.0 BCR, staff said the allowable project budget would be approximately $673,362, with the City's 25% share estimated at about $168,340. However, the updated appraised value and revised project budget increased the estimated total cost to roughly $874,860, resulting in an additional local funding gap of about $201,498 and a potential City contribution exceeding the previously budgeted amount.

Council discussed that the property is not located in a mapped floodplain, which contributed to a higher appraisal than prior buyouts. The Stormwater Advisory Committee forwarded the matter to council without a recommendation. Council provided direction to staff to contact the homeowner to gauge interest in contributing to the acquisition and indicated the City's participation would be capped at a maximum 25% local share contribution of approximately $227,000.

No formal vote was taken; the matter will proceed based on staff outreach and further review of grant eligibility and local funding options.