Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Electric Motorcycles topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Enumclaw council holds first reading of ordinance to regulate electric motorcycles
Summary
At its June 22 meeting the Enumclaw City Council heard a staff report on Ordinance 2839, a proposed municipal code chapter to define and regulate electric motorcycles, citing pedestrian‑safety concerns, equipment and operator requirements, and enforcement tools; staff recommended adoption at a later reading.
Get email alerts on the Electric Motorcycles topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
At its June 22 meeting the Enumclaw City Council held a first reading of Ordinance 2839, a proposed municipal code chapter that would define and regulate electric motorcycles within city limits.
The Police Chief, presenting the staff report, said the proposed ordinance seeks to close a regulatory gap. "Electric motorcycles, including high powered electric dirt bikes and similar vehicles, have become increasingly popular in recent years," the Chief said, and many of these vehicles are being operated on public streets, sidewalks and multi‑use trails, creating "ambiguity for riders, law enforcement, and the community regarding where and how these vehicles may be lawfully operated." The Chief noted the city has received resident complaints about unsafe speeds, sidewalk operation and near‑miss incidents with pedestrians.
The draft ordinance would: define electric motorcycles (distinguishing them from e‑bikes and mopeds by power, speed capability and design); restrict operation on sidewalks, parks and multi‑use trails except where specifically authorized; require helmets consistent with state law and minimum lighting and safety equipment for roadway use; require a valid driver's license for roadway operation and set age limits where appropriate; and establish a graduated enforcement regime allowing warnings, citations, misdemeanor classifications for serious violations, and vehicle impoundment for repeat or egregious cases. The Chief said staff recommended adoption to "enhance public safety, provide enforcement clarity, and address this topic" and noted the city's attorney had reviewed the proposed language for statutory consistency.
Council members were reminded this was a first reading; the Mayor noted that comments and amendments can be offered at the second reading. The Chief also referenced recent state legislation and a Department of Licensing work group (Senate Bill 6110) that plans state‑level guidance with a due date of October 2027, saying the city ordinance is intended to complement, not conflict with, forthcoming state rules.
No vote on Ordinance 2839 was taken at the June 22 meeting; the measure was presented for first reading and staff asked the council for direction ahead of a subsequent reading.
