Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Zoning Code topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Plan Commission reviews proposed zoning code changes, flags definition and notice questions

Mukwonago Plan Commission · May 12, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Mukwonago's Plan Commission discussed proposed code edits May 12, including removing Appendix G, edits to Appendix F, and a proposed "outdoor hospitality" use; commissioners asked staff to gather examples and clarify definitions and notice procedures before further action.

Mukwonago Plan Commission members reviewed proposed zoning code amendments May 12 from CIVITEC, including removing Appendix G, edits to Appendix F, and amendments to Appendix B that would add several new land uses (freestanding ATM, adult daycare center, batch plant, outdoor hospitality area, outdoor recreation/play area). Staff said Appendix G could be removed and recommended clarifying language in Appendix F to avoid confusion related to flood-plain references.

Commissioners raised a number of concerns about the proposed term "outdoor hospitality area," noting it is broader than "food and beverage" and could create ambiguity about when health-department rules apply. One commissioner pointed out that a food-and-beverage designation often triggers health-department scrutiny (cooking, hoods, permitting). Another concern was whether expanded administrative adjustments would reduce notice to neighbors; staff described proposed limits and examples where an administrative adjustment would apply to specific code sections for special circumstances.

Staff said they would gather examples from other municipalities and prepare clearer definitions and examples before returning with a recommendation. Commissioners also discussed potential new land uses and whether to retain or refine proposed language; no vote was taken at the meeting.